Thursday, August 6, 2009

Twitter back up after outage due to Denial-of Service attack by CNET

Update - Now Facebook and other services are down due to a flood of users switching while Twitter was down.

Twitter is back up after an outage lasting several hours. The micro-blogging service is still experiencing slowdowns and minor interruptions. They have posted a message on their blog stating that they are working to fix the issue but no word yet on further discoveries.

__________________________________________

Twitter crippled by denial-of-service attack

Oh, snap! I'm not even getting a fail whale!

Twitter was inaccessible for several hours on Thursday morning, followed by a period of slowness and sporadic time-outs (and more outright downtime). The company is blaming an "ongoing" denial-of-service attack but has not said anything further.

Judging by the timeline of my TweetDeck client, it looks like the problems started right around 6 a.m. PDT.

"We are determining the cause and will provide an update shortly," Twitter's staff posted at 6:43 a.m. PDT on the service's status blog.

Then, around 7:49 a.m. PT, the company posted, "We are defending against a denial-of-service attack and will update status again shortly."

Around 8:15 a.m., the status blog post was updated with "The site is back up, but we are continuing to defend against and recover from this attack." (I still was unable to access Twitter.)

Way back when, Twitter outages were so commonplace that it was worth reporting when it didn'tcrash--as when it stayed afloat during the entire South by Southwest Interactive Festival in 2008. Now, a few million dollars of venture capital later, the service is far more stable.

Twitter wants to establish itself as a communications standard rather than just a social-media brand. It's been a crucial platform for information exchange in the face of global events where more traditional means of broadcasting have been inaccessible or blocked.

Some features of Facebook were also experiencing uptime issues on Thursday--one reader speculated that log-in servers may have been down--which raises the issue of whether a hosting company problem is to blame. Alternately, a denial-of-service attack could have been targeting both high-profile companies.

Facebook is "looking into" the outages, spokeswoman Brandee Barker said in an e-mail.

A denial-of-service attack occurs when hackers overload a Web service's infrastructure with data, making its servers slow to a crawl or crash altogether.

There have been a notable number of DoS attacks recently in the social-media space: On Wednesday, URL shortener Trim claims that one such attack rendered its truncated URLs inaccessible for some time; earlier in the week, blog network Gawker Media was downed by an attack that targeted The Consumerist, a property that it recently sold but still hosts on its servers.

There has been no indication that any of these various attacks are connected. But it's probably not a coincidence that they all coincide with the annual Defcon hacker convention.

More to come when we hear it. Last updated at 8:16 a.m. PT.

Twitter has been down for 1 hour

Twitter has been down for the past hour. I have searched for news on this issue and contacted some of the networks but still no news.

There was news this morning on Mashable about spam attacks on accounts in Twitter yesterday. I have not learned if these issues are related.

Will keep you posted if I learn anything.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Financial Services Committee Passes Executive Compensation Reform

Bill would rein in compensation practices that led to excessive risk-taking; House consideration is expected on Friday

Washington , DC – Today, the Financial Services Committee approved legislation to put an end to the perverse compensation practices that encourage executives to take excessive risk at the expense of their companies, shareholders, employees, and ultimately the American taxpayer. H.R. 3269, the Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act, would prevent a return to a “heads I win, tails I break even” compensation system that contributed to recent financial collapse. The measure, which passed by a vote of 40-28, is the first piece of a larger regulatory reform package now being crafted by the Committee to address the causes of this crisis.

“This bill is the first step towards comprehensive financial regulatory reform,” said Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA). “I look forward to having this bill on the House floor soon, and I also look forward to changing the status quo.”

Specifically, H.R. 3269 would give shareholders a “say on pay” for top executives and ensure that they have a nonbinding, advisory vote on their company’s pay practices. In addition, the bill would require federal regulators to proscribe inappropriate or imprudently risky compensation practices as part of solvency regulation of all financial institutions. Financial firms would also be required to disclose any compensation structures that include incentive-based elements.

Recognizing the need to take the size of financial institutions into account, the Committee also adopted Rep. Jeb Hensarling’s (R-TX) amendment today that would exempt financial institutions with assets of less than $1 billion from the bill’s incentive-based compensation disclosure requirements and related compensation structure oversight. As a result of the amendment, Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA) said:

“The bill that passed out of Committee today reins in excessive compensation and ends the perverse incentives that caused too many executives to engage in overly risky behavior. I offered my amendment to exempt credit unions because I was concerned the legislation would force an unfair burden on innocent parties that had nothing to do with our current financial crisis. I withdrew my amendment after working with the Chairman and Rep. Hensarling to reach a responsible compromise that would exempt smaller credit unions and financial institutions.”

Today’s legislation comes in response to a broad consensus of leading finance experts, including Paul Volcker and the Group of 30 and Lord Turner of the United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority, who believe that compensation structures were a factor in the financial crisis. Both the United Kingdom and the European Union are contemplating similar rules.

The Committee today also amended H.R. 3269 in the following ways:

Manager’s Amendment (Frank D-MA) – The manager’s amendment contains mostly technical changes to clarify intent, conform to existing provisions of securities law, and promote internal consistency within the bill, but also makes the following substantive changes:

  • Adds a provision that would allow the SEC to exempt certain categories of issuers from the say-on-pay requirements where appropriate, taking into account, among other considerations, the potential impact on smaller reporting issuers;
  • Clarifies that the compensation committee independence standards apply only to public companies, not to companies that have only an issue of publically registered debt;
  • Requires that the independence standards for compensation consultants to be promulgated by the SEC are “competitively neutral among categories of consultants and preserve the ability of compensation committees to retain the services of members of any such category”;
  • Deletes a provision that requires an issuer’s annual disclosure of whether it used an independent compensation consultant to include an explanation of why it chose not to use a consultant;
  • Specifically provides that financial companies that do not have incentive-based payment arrangements are not required to make disclosures regarding incentive-based payment arrangements; and
  • Narrows the scope of the regulators’ authority to prohibit compensation structures by rule to allow such prohibitions only of incentive-based payment arrangements (as opposed to any compensation structures or incentive-based payment arrangements) of covered financial institutions.

Mrs. Kilroy (D-OH) – Requires at least annual reporting of annual say-on-pay and golden parachutes votes by all institutional investors, unless such votes are otherwise required to be reported publicly by SEC rule.

Mr. Hensarling (R-TX) Exempts financial institutions with less than $1B in assets from the incentive-based pay provisions in section 4.

Mr. Hensarling (R-TX) – Requires the GAO to study the correlation between compensation structure and excessive risk-taking and report to Congress within one year of enactment. Factors to be considered include compensation structures used by companies from 2000-2008, and a comparison of companies that failed, or nearly failed but for government assistance, and companies that remained viable through the market turmoil of 2007-2008.

Mr. Price (R-GA) – Provides that compensation approved by a majority say-on-pay vote is not subject to clawback, except as provided by contract or due to fraud to the extent provided by federal law.

Mr. Hensarling (R-TX) – Adds Fannie and Freddie to the list of financial institutions subject to the incentive-based pay provisions of section 4 and adds FHFA as a financial regulator with rulemaking authority for such provisions.

###